Amendment to the Constitution

Lambino Vs. COMELEC
G.R. No. 174153, October 25, 2006

Facts: The Lambino Group's initiative petition proposes changes in the 1987 Constitution thru R.A. 6735. It submit to modify the Sections 1-7 of Article VI (Legislative Department) and Sections 1-4 of Article VII (Executive Department) and by adding Article XVIII entitled "Transitory Provisions." These proposed changes will shift the present Bicameral-Presidential system to a Unicameral-Parliamentary form of government.

Issue: Whether the petition has complied with the constitutional requirement.

Held: First, the Initiative Petition Does Not Comply with Section 2, Article XVII of the Constitution on Direct Proposal by the People. Section 2, Article XVII of the Constitution is the governing constitutional provision that allows a people's initiative to propose amendments to the Constitution. This section states: “Sec. 2. Amendments to this Constitution may likewise be directly proposed by the people through initiative upon a petition of at least twelve per centum of the total number of registered voters of which every legislative district must be represented by at least three per centum of the registered voters therein. xxx (Emphasis supplied)

Clearly, the framers of the Constitution intended that the "draft of the proposed constitutional amendment" should be "ready and shown" to the people "before" they sign such proposal. The framers plainly stated that "before they sign there is already a draft shown to them." The framers also "envisioned" that the people should sign on the proposal itself because the proponents must "prepare that proposal and pass it around for signature."

The essence of amendments "directly proposed by the people through initiative upon a petition" is that the entire proposal on its face is a petition by the people. This means two essential elements must be present. First, the people must author and thus sign the entire proposal. No agent or representative can sign on their behalf. Second, as an initiative upon a petition, the proposal must be embodied in a petition.

Second, revision broadly implies a change that alters a basic principle in the constitution, like altering the principle of separation of powers or the system of checks-and-balances. There is also revision if the change alters the substantial entirety of the constitution, as when the change affects substantial provisions of the constitution. On the other hand, amendment broadly refers to a change that adds, reduces, or deletes without altering the basic principle involved. Revision generally affects several provisions of the constitution, while amendment generally affects only the specific provision being amended.

Mga Komento

Mag-post ng isang Komento

Mga sikat na post sa blog na ito

People Vs. Dio, GR No. L-36461, June 29, 1984

Facts: At about noontime Crispulo Alega fetch his girlfriend, Remedios Maniti. They proceeded to the Pasay City Public Market. As they were going up the stairs leading to the Teresa and Sons Restaurant, Remedios, who was about an arms-length ahead of Crispulo suddenly heard the dropping of her folders and other things, being carried by Crispulo. When she looked back, she saw a man — later Identified as Danilo Tobias but still at large — twisting the neck of Crispulo, while the appellant was holding his (Crispulo's) two hands. The appellant and his companion tried to divest Crispulo of his "Seiko" wrist watch, but Crispulo resisted their attempt and fought the robbers. At this juncture, the man who was twisting the neck of Crispulo stabbed the latter on the left side of his chest. Crispulo ran down the stairs followed by Remedies who shouted for help. When he reached the front of the Pasay Commercial Bank he fell down and expired. At the time of his death, the "Seik...
Magbasa nang higit pa

People Vs. Lamahang, GR No L-4330, August 3, 1935

Facts: At early dawn on March 2, 1935, policeman Jose Tomambing, who was patrolling his beat on Delgado and C.R. Fuentes streets of the City of Iloilo, caught the accused in the act of making an opening with an iron bar on the wall of a store of cheap goods located on the last named street. At that time the owner of the store, Tan Yu, was sleeping inside with another Chinaman. The accused had only succeeded in breaking one board and in unfastening another from the wall, when the policeman showed up, who instantly arrested him and placed him under custody. Ruling: It is necessary to prove that said beginning of execution, if carried to its complete termination following its natural course, without being frustrated by external obstacles nor by the voluntary desistance of the perpetrator, will logically and necessarily ripen into a concrete offense. xxx In case of robbery, in order that the simple act of entering by means of force or violence another person's dwelling may...
Magbasa nang higit pa

People Vs. Campuhan, GR No. 129433, March 30, 2000

Facts: Ma. Corazon P. Pamintuan, mother of four (4)-year old Crysthel Pamintuan, went down from the second floor of their house to prepare Milo chocolate drinks for her two (2) children. At the ground floor she met Primo Campuhan who was then busy filling small plastic bags with water to be frozen into ice in the freezer located at the second floor. Primo was a helper of Conrado Plata Jr., brother of Corazon. As Corazon was busy preparing the drinks, she heard one of her daughters cry, "Ayo'ko, ayo'ko!" prompting Corazon to rush upstairs. Thereupon, she saw Primo Campuhan inside her children's room kneeling before Crysthel whose pajamas or "jogging pants" and panty were already removed, while his short pants were down to his knees. According to Corazon, Primo was forcing his penis into Crysthel's vagina. Horrified, she cursed the accused, "P - t - ng ina mo, anak ko iyan!" and boxed him several times. He evaded her blows and pulle...
Magbasa nang higit pa